Tsars vs BC.GAME
Two casinos from our index, set against each other on every figure we hold — the components of the score, the withdrawal terms each casino publishes, and what players report about getting paid. Pick any two below.
3.0 points apart on a ten-point scale — computed from the components below, never set by hand.
Where the 3.0 points come from.
What each casino says it will pay, and how.
TsarsAnjouan (Comoros)
BC.GAMEAnjouan (Comoros)
What players say happened when they asked to be paid.
Tsars51 complaints on file
BC.GAME711 complaints on file
Each line is a player's account as published on the named source, not a finding of ours. Read on 27 Sept 2026.
Which one, and for whom.
A huge payment menu and fast crypto rails, weighed against the most one-star reviews in the index, a clause allowing winnings to be confiscated for low-risk play, and deposit-bonus terms that differ between its own help articles. Scores 7.7: Safety Index 7.8, 711 complaints on file.
Read this before you deposit TsarsClean audit and few complaints, but its terms promise withdrawals only within 72 hours, cap them at €30,000 a month, and let it keep 20% of a withdrawal — which it did on both of our August withdrawals. Scores 4.7: Safety Index 9.0, 51 complaints on file.
Every casino, ranked on the same evidence.
This comparison uses the same formula and sources the index does — nothing here is weighted differently because two names sit side by side.