Somebody has to show the working.
Velven exists because casino rankings rarely show where their numbers come from. Ours do: every figure is tied to a public source and a date, every score is a published formula, and every verdict carries a name.
One pan takes the money. The other holds the evidence. Only one of them is weighed.
We read the record nobody reads, write down where every number came from, and publish the arithmetic — including the scores that go down.
Every verdict carries a name and a date.
Wrote the part of Velven that says no. The build he wrote refuses to publish a figure without a source and a date, computes every score from the formula rather than accepting one, and stops the site from going out if a page makes a claim the record does not support. Most of his work is invisible, which is how you can tell it is working.
Reads every casino’s record — the audit, the complaint file, the player reviews and the published terms — and decides which player reports are specific enough to publish. She signs every casino review.
Reads every game against the studio’s own pages and the specification databases, and publishes every return configuration the sources list — including where they disagree with each other.
Offer us whatever you like.
Commission pays for the work. It buys nothing else.
What no operator can buy
- A place in the index, or the No. 1 spot
- A band, a score, or a softer verdict
- A player report taken down
- A preview of a review before it publishes
- A right of reply before a score goes live
- A lower return configuration quietly left out of a slot review
What always happens
- Every figure names its source and the day we read it
- Every score is computed by the published formula
- Scores that fall publish exactly like scores that rise
- Player reports are labelled as theirs, not ours
- Everything is re-read every 90 days
Corrections happen in public, or they do not count.
Anyone can challenge a figure, and every source is re-read on cadence whether or not somebody complains.
Not a discussion with the operator — the same sources, read the same way, run through the same formula.
Dated, on the review and on the corrections page, stating what moved and why — whichever way it went.
Challenge a number.
Tell us which figure, on which page, and where you saw something different. We would rather be corrected in public than be quietly wrong.
See what has already been correctedYou are welcome to point out an error in our sources. You are not able to buy a position, preview a review, or have a player report removed — those are not negotiable and never will be.
Read the method firstStart with the record.
Every casino we have scored, ranked by one published formula over sourced evidence.